The Reality of Clear Communication at Work

Share This Post

Clear Communication is one of those topics where everyone nods… 

“Yes, absolutely, communication is vital.” 

Then five minutes later, someone leaves a meeting thinking: 

“Well… I have absolutely no idea what just happened.” 

 Clear communication is not rare because leaders do not care. It is rare because clarity is deceptively hard. Particularly when the stakes are high, emotions are running high, and uncertainty is unavoidable. 

 And if we are honest, most organisations are swimming in uncertainty. 

 Strategy shifts. Buyouts. Restructures. Market shocks. Crises. Government policy changes. Culture change. Hybrid working. AI. Regulation. 

Pick your flavour of discomfort. 

 This is where communication stops being a soft skill and becomes a performance skill. 

When Clarity Matters Most (Why Leaders Struggle Most Here)

Clear communication is always important. But there are certain moments where it becomes absolutely critical: 

  •  A change of business direction 
  • A merger or acquisition 
  • A restructure or redundancy programme 
  • A crisis or operational failure 
  • Strategic planning and goal alignment 
  • Performance conversations 
  • Team conflict 

Ironically, these are also the moments where leaders are least likely to feel clear themselves. 

Because clarity requires something deeply uncomfortable: 

  •  Saying what you know 
  • Admitting what you do not know
  • Resisting the urge to over-reassure
  • Staying present with other people’s reactions 

Which brings me to one of the best examples of leadership communication I have ever heard:  A leader addressing her team during significant organisational uncertainty: 

“Here’s what we know. 
Here’s what we don’t know yet. 
Here’s what this likely means for you right now. 
And here’s when you’ll hear more.” 

No theatre. No corporate poetry. No defensive spin. Just structure, honesty, and tone. But what made it powerful was what happened next. 

She stayed in the discomfort. 
She called on people by name. 
She invited reactions. 

“What concerns you most?” 

 She did not defend. 
She did not over-explain. 
She did not pretend certainty she did not have. 

When she did not know, she said so. 
Then, followed up within 48 hours. 

That is clarity under uncertainty. Not certainty, but honest, two-way clarity. 

Q: Do your messages reduce uncertainty, or accidentally amplify it? 
Q: When was the last time you explicitly said, “Here is what we do not know yet” 

Real Business Examples of Communication Done Well 

Let’s ground this in the real world for a moment. 

Brian Chesky, Airbnb Layoff Letter 
When Airbnb faced devastating losses during COVID, Brian Chesky’s redundancy communication became widely cited as a model of clear, human leadership. 

Why it worked: 

  • Direct explanation of what was happening 
  • Transparent reasoning behind decisions 
  • Clear description of impact 
  • Deep empathy and dignity 

No jargon. No distancing language. No “strategic resizing of workforce synergies”. 

Just clarity and humanity. 

You can read it here:  https://news.airbnb.com/a-message-from-co-founder-and-ceo-brian-chesky/ 

Crisis Communication Failures (Because These Teach Us More) 

History is littered with examples where unclear, defensive, or delayed communication amplified problems: 

  • Leaders speaking too late 
  • Leaders saying too little 
  • Leaders sounding evasive 
  • Leaders over-reassuring in ways that later collapse 

The damage is rarely just operational – It is psychological. 

Confusion breeds anxiety. 
Anxiety breeds rumour. 
Rumour breeds distrust. 

And once trust wobbles, everything becomes harder. 

What Leaders Often Get Wrong About Communication 

Most communication breakdowns are not about intelligence or intent – They are about assumptions. 

 Leaders assume: 

  • “I was clear.” 
  • “They understood.” 
  • “I explained the strategy.” 
  • “I told them why.” 

Meanwhile, employees (I’m sure you’ve been here) are thinking: 

  • “What exactly am I supposed to do differently?” 
  • “How does this affect me?” 
  • “Is this good news or bad news?” 
  • “Why does this change keep happening?”

Clarity is not what you say. Clarity is what lands.  

Clarity Through a Leader’s Lens 

Wiley’s Work of Leaders frames leadership around three drivers:

  • Vision 
  • Alignment 
  • Execution 

Clarity sits right at the centre of this.  Without clarity: 

Vision becomes vague inspiration 
Alignment becomes polite confusion
Execution becomes an inconsistent effort 

One of my favourite Work of Leaders ideas is this: 
Leaders must create a shared understanding of reality. 

Not just ambition. Reality.
Which means saying things like: 

  • “Here is what success actually looks like.” 
  • “Here are the priorities.” 
  • “Here is what will not change.” 
  • “Here is what we are still figuring out.” 

Clarity is structure plus honesty. 

Click here for more on WILEY’s Work Of Leaders.

Clear Communication From the Receiver’s Perspective 

Here is something leaders routinely underestimate. Employees are not just processing information. They are processing meaning, risk, emotion, and implication. 

People listening to leadership communication are silently asking: 

  • Do I understand this?
  • Do I believe this?
  • How does this affect me?
  • Is this safe?
  • What happens if I get this wrong? 

Which is why clarity is never just cognitive – It is emotional. 

Q: When you communicate change, do people ask fewer questions, or more confused ones? 

And We Are All Different – What Different DiSC Styles Need From Clear Communication 

Here is where DiSC becomes incredibly practical. Because different people experience the same message very differently. 

D Style

Wants: Directness, outcomes, decisions 
Listens for: “What is changing? What is expected?” 

i Style

Wants: Meaning, energy, connection 
Listens for: “Why does this matter? Who is involved?” 

S Style

Wants: Reassurance, stability, impact on people 
Listens for: “How will this affect us? What stays consistent?” 

C Style

Wants: Detail, logic, accuracy 
Listens for: “What is the evidence? What are the timelines?” 

Here is the crucial leadership shift – It is not about delivering four separate messages. It is about crafting one message that speaks to all four needs. 

For example: 
“Today you will receive an email outlining our new approach.” 
Head’s up (reduces anxiety) 

“We have made this change because…” 
Meaning and logic 

“This may feel unsettling or daunting right now…” 
Empathy 

“Here is what good looks like moving forward…” 
Clarity of expectation 

“Here is what this means for you in practical terms…” 
Relevance 

“Please come to me if you are unsure…” 
Support and psychological safety 

That is DiSC-aware leadership communication. Structured. Human. Inclusive. 

Q: Does your communication style unintentionally favour one DiSC style over others? 

Clarity Is Also About Tone (And This Is Where Many Leaders Trip) 

You can be factually clear and still create confusion. Because tone communicates just as loudly as words. People are exquisitely sensitive to: 

  • Defensiveness
  • Evasiveness
  • Artificial optimism
  • Discomfort avoidance
  • Emotional absence 

Clarity with a poor tone feels cold. 
Empathy without clarity feels vague. 

The magic sits in the middle. 

Why This Matters More Than Ever 

Modern workplaces are cognitively overloaded and emotionally stretched. People are navigating: 

  • Constant change
  • Information saturation
  • Performance pressure
  • Ambiguity fatigue 

Clear communication is no longer just leadership polish. 

It is a stabilising force. 
It reduces friction. 
It protects trust. 
It supports performance. 
It strengthens culture. 

Because culture, as we often say, is behaviour.  And behaviour follows clarity. 

Where Culture Stretch Fits Into This 

This is precisely where we spend a lot of our time with leaders and teams. Not teaching people to “communicate better” in some generic sense. 

But helping leaders understand: 

  • How their natural DiSC style shapes their communication
  • How others are likely to interpret their messages
  • Where misalignment and misunderstanding creep in
  • How to flex communication under pressure 

Because most leaders are not unclear.  They are unintentionally style-biased.
And once you see that pattern, everything changes. 

Final Thought 

Clear communication is not about sounding polished. 

It is about reducing ambiguity, increasing shared understanding, and making it easier for people to think, decide, and act. 

Particularly when things are uncertain. 
Particularly when things are uncomfortable. 
Particularly when it would be easier to hide behind corporate language. 

Clarity is not loud. 
Clarity is not dramatic. 
Clarity is deliberate. 

Q: Do people leave conversations clearer, calmer, and more focused? Or just quieter?

More To Explore